Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Who Created Cartoon Character "Man Haron Monis" Behind "Sydney Siege" Circus?

Previously an outspoken critic of Iranian government, was interviewed by Australian media in 2001, loved Western society... 

December 15, 2014 (Tony Cartalucci - LD) As predicted, the suspect amid the "Sydney Siege," has long been on the radar of Australian law enforcement, as well as a frequent visitor to Australia's court system. 

Before that, however, he came to Australia as a political refugee, an opponent of what he called the "Iranian regime," and was even interviewed by Australia's ABC network in 2001 as part of an ongoing anti-Iranian propaganda campaign.  

It has been revealed that long-time agitator, alias "Man Haron Monis," also known as "Manteghi Boroujerdi," was the suspect amid the so-called "Sydney Siege" hostage crisis. Monis/Boroujerdi claims to be a Shia'a religious leader and is often seen in press photos dressed as one.

Despite this, he was at the center of a hostage crisis requesting the flag of the "Islamic State" terrorist organization be delivered to him while claiming association with other ISIS "brothers."

Neither Islamic nor a state, ISIS is led by US, Israeli, and Saudi-backed Wahabi terrorists, promoting a perversion of Sunni Islam - the bane to both genuine Sunnis and Shia'a worldwide and against which both the nations of Syria and Iran are fighting.

Monis/Boroujerdi rose to infamy amid two notable incidents - one being his involvement in the stabbing death and burning of his ex-wife - the other being his controversial campaign of sending hate-letters to the families of dead Australian soldiers killed during the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan. The latter was used extensively to stir up division across the pro and anti-war political divide.

The Australian in a September 2013 article titled, "'Cleric' Man Haron Monis punished for offensive letters written to families of dead Diggers," reported that:

A SELF-styled Muslim cleric has been sentenced to 300 hours of community service for penning "grossly offensive" letters to families of soldiers killed in Afghanistan. 
Man Haron Monis, also known as Sheik Haron, was also placed on a two-year good behaviour bond. 
So too was his co-accused and partner, 34-year-old Amirah Droudis, who pleaded guilty to one count of aiding and abetting him.
In December of 2013, the Australian Daily Telegraph would report in an article titled, "'Hate' sheik Man Horan Monis and girlfriend Amirzh Droudis granted bail on murder charges," that:
Monis is charged as an accessory before and after the fact to the murder of Noleen Hayson Pal, 30, who was stabbed 18 times and set alight outside a western Sydney unit in April.
Monis/Boroujerdi's Origins Story 

But before Monis/Boroujerdi's recent run-ins with the law and his role as chief "Muslim boogeyman" in Australia, he was "Manteghi Boroujerdi," a "victim" of the "Iranian regime" who was in love with Western society.

Australia's ABC in its "Religion Report" dated January 31, 2001, introduced Monis/Boroujerdi as follows:
...while in Sydney we talk to Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi, an Iranian cleric espousing a liberal brand of Islam - dangerously liberal, as his views have led to his wife and two daughters being held hostage in Iran.

The interview itself is used as yet another vehicle to carry along Western propaganda long-aimed at Iran. It claims Monis/Boroujerdi's family is in grave danger and that Monis/Boroujerdi himself would be executed should he ever return to Iran. It quotes Monis/Boroujerdi several times including claims he was formally associated with Iranian intelligence:
In Iran, mostly I have been involved with the Ministry of Intelligence and Security.
And was in contact with the UN regarding security issues in Iran:
...more than four years I have not seen my family, and the Iranian regime doesn't let them come out. In fact I can say they are hostage; as a hostage the Iranian regime wants to make me silent, because I have some secret information about government, and about their terrorist operations in the war. I sent a letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and somebody on behalf of Mr Kofi Anan sent the answer, and they want to do something. I have hope and always I pray and ask God to solve my problem.

At one point during the interview Monis/Boroujerdi professes his love of Australia, Canada, the US, and UK claiming:
...we can say Australia, Canada, England, USA, so many western countries, they are religious societies. They don't say 'We are religious', but in fact the spirit of religion, we can see the spirit of religion in these societies. And some other countries in the Middle East, in Asia, they say 'We are Islamic' they have a name of Islamic, but in fact they are not religious societies and religious governments. Whenever I walk in the street, whenever I go out in Australia, I feel I am in a real religious society. I don't want to say it is perfect, we don't have a perfect society on the earth, but when we compare, if we compare Australia with Iran and other countries in the Middle East, we can say it is heaven.

However, later in 2008, Monis/Boroujerdi's activities drew the attention of real Shia'a religious leaders in Australia who asked Australian security agents to investigate him. In an Australian article titled, "Call to probe mystery Shia cleric," it was reported that:
FEDERAL agents have been urged by the nation's senior Shia leader, Kamal Mousselmani, to investigate an Iranian man purporting to be a prominent Islamic cleric. 
Sheik Mousselmani told The Australian yesterday the mystery cleric - who has been identified as Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi on his website after appearing under the name Sheik Haron - was not a genuine Shia spiritual leader. 
He said there were no ayatollahs - supreme Shia scholars - in Australia and none of his fellow spiritual leaders knew who Ayatollah Boroujerdi or Sheik Haron was. 
"We don't know him and we have got nothing to do with him," Sheik Mousselmani said. "The federal police should investigate who he is. It should be their responsibility."
But it was the Australian media itself who introduced him publicly as an "Ayatollah" and the Australian government that vetted him and allegedly granted him political asylum. He was allegedly in contact with the UN and was used to stir up anti-Iranian sentiment in Australia. It is then highly suspicious that now both the Australian media and the Australian government appear to have no knowledge of who he is or where he came from.

For someone used as part of the West's anti-Iranian propaganda campaign, and who was granted political asylum into Australia, but who is now supposedly unknown to those who invited him in and used him, there is clearly more to the story of Monis/Boroujerdi - a story that may then offer insight into his latest performance. Perhaps most ironic of all is the fact that the "Iranian regime" he was used to demonize apparently did not kill his wife - instead, he himself is suspected of doing so.

Whatever the case is, Monis/Boroujerdi is certainly no "lone wolf terrorist." He, at best, is yet another Frankenstein of the establishment run amok after an abortive attempt to cultivate and use him to advance Western foreign and domestic policy. At worse, he is directly involved in an intelligence operation to further inflame division in Australian society and promote the long stalled war in Syria aimed at regime change there, before heading to Iran - the scorn of Monis/Boroujerdi.

An omnipresent all-invasive surveillance state that is constantly "blindsided" by terror attacks carried out by criminals and characters possessing extensive criminal records and who are well-acquainted with that state's law enforcement, media, and even government, is testament to the fact that such surveillance hasn't been and never was intended to serve the public's best interests nor to keep them safe - but rather another system of control and manipulation to allow true dangers to human civilization to endure with impunity.Their agendas are formulated what is called the Hegelian dialectic – the process by which Illuminati objectives are achieved. According to the Hegelian dialectic, thesis plus antithesis equals synthesis. In other words, first you foment a crisis. Then there is an enormous public outcry that something must be done about the problem. So you offer a solution that brings about the changes you really wanted all along, but which people would have been unwilling to accept initially:
1) Abolition of all ordered governments 
2) Abolition of private property 
3) Abolition of inheritance 
4) Abolition of patriotism 
5) Abolition of the family 
6) Abolition of religion 
7) Creation of a world government 
8) Reduce the world population dramatically

The Order of the Garter is the secret inner group which is an elite group within the Order of St. John of Jerusalem which is the British part of the Knights of Malta. The Knights of the Garter are the leaders of the Committee of 300.
They are diabolical men.

Lord Peter Carrington, who is a member of the satanic Order of Osiris and other demonic groups is a member of the Order of the Garter. Lord Palmerston is an example from history of another similar example of a Knight of the Garter who was totally corrupt, pretended to be a Christian, and practiced Satanism. Bloodlines of the Illuminati - DuPonts

To bring about depopulation of large cities according to the trial run carried out by the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia. It is interesting to note that Pol Pot’s genocidal plans were drawn up in the US by one of the Club of Rome’s research foundations, and overseen by Thomas Enders, a high-ranking State Department official.

It is also interesting that the committee is currently seeking to reinstate the Pol Pot butchers in Cambodia, his name is Hun Sen.

This committee of 300 is modeled after the British East India Company’s Council of 300, founded by the British aristocracy in 1727.

Most of its immense wealth arose out of the opium trade with China. This group is responsible for the phony drug wars here in the U.S. These phony drug wars were to get us to give away our constitutional rights.

Asset forfeiture is a prime example, where huge assets can be seized without trial and no proof of guilt needed. Also the Committee of 300 long ago decreed that there shall be a smaller-much smaller-and better world, that is, their idea of what constitutes a better world. Look like a lot of Chinese and Indians have to go.

The myriads of useless eaters consuming scarce natural resources were to be culled. Industrial progress supports population growth, the command to multiply and subdue the earth found in Genesis had to be subverted. If SEAWAPA aims are to make a better place with lots of population, it had failed and won't be supported as a concept.

This called for an attack upon Christianity; the slow but sure disintegration of industrial nation states; the destruction of hundreds of millions of people, referred to by the Committee of 300 as "surplus population," and the removal of any leader who dared to stand in the way of the Committee’s global planning to reach the foregoing objectives.

Not that the U.S. government didn’t know, but as it was part of the conspiracy, it helped to keep the lid on information rather than let the truth be known.

Queen, Elizabeth II, is the head of the Committee of 300.

The Committee of 300 looks to social convulsions on a global scale, followed by depressions, as a softening-up technique for bigger things to come, as its principal method of creating masses of people all over the world who will become its "welfare" recipients of the future.
The committee appears to base much of its important decisions affecting mankind on the philosophy of Polish aristocrat, Felix Dzerzinski, who regarded mankind as being slightly above the level of cattle.

As a close friend of British intelligence agent Sydney Reilly (Reilly was actually Dzerzinski’s controller during the Bolshevik Revolution’s formative years), he often confided in Reilly during his drinking bouts.

Dzerzinski was, of course, the beast who ran the Red Terror apparatus.
He once told Reilly, while the two were on a drinking binge, that,
"Man is of no importance. Look at what happens when you starve him. He begins to eat his dead companions to stay alive. Man is only interested in his own survival. That is all that counts. All the Spinoza stuff is a lot of rubbish."

UPDATESHard Proof Sydney Hostage Crisis was a Movie Set

This information represents hard proof—absolute proof—that the Sydney hostage crisis and resultant murders were not a true hostage crisis or murders in the least. Instead, as demonstrated here they were absolute fakes: no hostages were taken, no one died, no one was shot, and no one was injured.
By no means can anyone dispute these findings. They are absolute, that is impossible to refute. It is a wretched, terminal lie, all orchestrated by the criminally corrupt war-mongering and war-generating arch-Zionist cabal.
The Sydney purported hostage/kidnapping event, that supposedly ended in two murders, is now proven to be a non-issue, that is a non-event. It was a movie set, and this will be demonstrated categorically. There is little to any need to waste any further time on this fraud. It was a kind of Hollywood-style terror hoax with a modest Australian flavor. All the people involved in the imagery who are seemingly involved in dramatic events are mere paid crisis actors.
The drama of fake actors has been demonstrated, here, earlier, as a post on the Fake Dead and Wounded of this terminally corrupt fabrication. Notice the use of mere red paint which has been applied by moulage experts to her lower legs and ankles. There are surely no gunshot wounds to those lower legs, and this was the acclaimed means behind any deaths and/or injuries. Regardless, if she were shot in those lower legs, she would never be transported in such a way. Rather, she would be rendered supine for purposes of preventing and/or minimizing further loss of blood. This posture/imagery is strictly for movie-making purposes, which begins the proof here of the degree of the scam.
The individual is none other than arch-Zionist agent Marcia Mikhael, who appeared prominently on a video where an ISIS flag is seen in the background.
Here she is with her husband, George Michael:

Bulgarian Jewish Names
based on Moscona, I.: “The origin of the Jewish Bulgarian Names”, 1967. … Mezan, Mikhael (Michael),Mikhaelogli…
No doubt, Mikhael is a Zionist agent, in fact, an agent of the Mossad. They are surely dual Israeli-Australian citizens, working for high level Zionist infiltrators in the Australian government. In this regard it should be kept in mind that this Israeli played one of the most prominent roles in this scam.
She just went in for a cup of coffee, and there it was, a Sephardic Jew fake imitating a Muslim, ready to launch an attack on her: poor thing.
Astonishing account ... Marcia Mikhael found herself caught up in an unprecedented act of
Astonishing account … Marcia Mikhael found herself caught up in an unprecedented act of hatred as she bought her morning coffee. 
Here is additional movie drama. See the three crisis actors? What else is seen? It’s the Burger & Beer sign. This is a focal point of the movie set.
What else is seen? It is a kind of director, the man in the center with the headset and wire. He is clearly coordinating this part of the set.

The dramatics are necessary to overwhelm the sheep-like followers of the arch-Zionist media cabal. That drama entraps the mind, causing people to be captivated. The result is an emotional response; the thinking mechanism is neutralized.
He is, in fact, a director and/or producer. Notice the gear on his head, along with the wire. Moreover, what are the drama actors doing at this time? They are looking directly at the producer for instructions and/or guidance.
There wee other drama hoaxers, producers, directors, and coordinators, as well as camera-persons, who were off-screen or just off-screen, as in this example:
From the strategic position of the camera-person it is clear that this is a set-up, once again, a movie-like set.
How about the following example of a pre-arranged movie production? What else can be considered? When in the universe have SWAT team members found it necessary to aim their weapons directly into the lenses of cameras?
Police Hostage Situation Developing In Sydney
No one can dispute it. That is precisely what they are doing. Plus, instead of concentrating on any dangerous individuals or gunman, instead of aiming their guns as a protection for the ‘hostages,’ instead of keeping their eyes on crisis central, what are they doing? They are pointing their guns at the movie directors and camera-persons, while focusing their eyes directly into the lens.
How about the purported kidnapping hoaxers? They, too, are clearly acting on instructions, posing for the role.

Chief among them are the workers within the Lindt cafe themselves, including the woman above.
Too, along with her in some of the images is that terminally hostile arch-Zionist agent, Celine Winpe, who is the key cohort crisis actress, along with Mikhael.

Now comes the crisis actor Lindt ‘worker’, then turned escapee, on the run. Once again, it is clear that this is a mere agent of a drill and is by no means running from any danger. Too, what is the SWAT cop aiming at? There is nothing in the background, which is clear and obvious.
Despite the dangers that surround her she takes the time to look right at the producer/camera-person, right into the camera lens:

For her impressive role as a new-found actor she is given a thumbs-up by the SWAT hoaxer.
And now, again….
And now for the climax, all for massive public consumption. The Zionists and their collaborators are truly conniving.
Remember this hoaxer and arch-Zionist agent, whose image was published, here, in the original post? Notice the controller in the background:
Notice, too, the SWAT cop with the pistol and how at this point it is pointed downward. Now what happens?

The old man is a better crisis actor than these youngsters. Both the SWAT hoaxer and the arch-Zionist Israeli agent, both of them are looking directly at the director/camera-person; the aiming of the pistol, of course, makes no sense. There are no gunman next to the movie producer.
Absolutely, this is a hoax. There is nothing true about it. ‘Our good friend and brother Mr. Aaron Monis has been very kind to us. He brought us water and let us use the toilet.’ Who in God’s name believes such drivel?